GCwaitforever
07-09 08:27 AM
Good job guys. May be it is time we invite Labor secretary Elaine Chao also to participate in these talk shows (in addition to law makers like Kennedy/Brownback/McCain). That is the only participant missing - someone from DOL/USCIS/DHS, as the Government entity responsible for immigration.
wallpaper Get gorgeous, healthy hair
logiclife
07-02 12:30 AM
(7/1/2006)UPDATE
THERE WILL BE ANOTHER INTERVIEW NEXT WEEK ON JUL 8TH (Saturday), ON LEGAL IMMIGRATION ON SAME CHANNEL AT 4:00 EST ON SAME PROGRAM "COURTYARD" on KPFK. PLEASE SEE BELOW ON THE DETAILS AND VARIOUS OPTIONS TO LISTEN INTO THE PROGRAM AS WELL AS CALL-IN FOR QUESTIONS/COMMENTS.
----------------------------------------
THERE WILL BE ANOTHER INTERVIEW NEXT WEEK ON JUL 8TH (Saturday), ON LEGAL IMMIGRATION ON SAME CHANNEL AT 4:00 EST ON SAME PROGRAM "COURTYARD" on KPFK. PLEASE SEE BELOW ON THE DETAILS AND VARIOUS OPTIONS TO LISTEN INTO THE PROGRAM AS WELL AS CALL-IN FOR QUESTIONS/COMMENTS.
----------------------------------------
RNGC
04-04 02:55 PM
Guys,
You are doing a great job....keep up the good work.
You are doing a great job....keep up the good work.
2011 Reese Witherspoon#39;s Chanel
vinicola78
11-04 02:17 PM
I am also trying to stay afloat through the very debatable AC21 process. Currently, my case is being handled by Ron Gotcher and I have been very happy with all the help and support so far. Not to mention, they are really reasonable.
more...
ivorycard
06-16 09:31 PM
I recently moved to Cincinnati, OH.
My I-485 was filled in TSC; when I did an e-file today for I-131, the receipt confirmation documents to send it to TSC.
All other documents on the uscis site suggest sending it to NSC based on OH State.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
My I-485 was filled in TSC; when I did an e-file today for I-131, the receipt confirmation documents to send it to TSC.
All other documents on the uscis site suggest sending it to NSC based on OH State.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
ImmiUser
07-10 08:45 PM
Following intresting info is listed on the immigration-law, wish it is true :)
"There has been going around a rumor lately that the USCIS was internally discussing retreat from the 485 rejection decision. It appears that this rumor probably started from the USCIS HQ order over the Texas Service Center to hold all the July 2007 EB-485 applications abeyanbce and not to return the applications to applicants. Unconfirmed sources indicate that because of the order, the Texas Service Center is not returning the EB-485 applications which have been received since July 2, 2007. However, there is no evidence that the decision is necessarily related to its potential decision to withdraw the rejection decision. At this point, its reasons are completion unknown. Please stay tuned. "
"There has been going around a rumor lately that the USCIS was internally discussing retreat from the 485 rejection decision. It appears that this rumor probably started from the USCIS HQ order over the Texas Service Center to hold all the July 2007 EB-485 applications abeyanbce and not to return the applications to applicants. Unconfirmed sources indicate that because of the order, the Texas Service Center is not returning the EB-485 applications which have been received since July 2, 2007. However, there is no evidence that the decision is necessarily related to its potential decision to withdraw the rejection decision. At this point, its reasons are completion unknown. Please stay tuned. "
more...
jsb
09-18 08:36 AM
JSB,
You may be right. But with your logic all these talk about opening an SR, getting an infopass and blah blah is not right then. We have polls here on what worked....that's what i was telling it is too much of a coincidence. Opening an SR won't make a sick IO healthy and come back to work..taking an infopass won't bring a dropped out file back in the pile...talking to senators and congressman are useless anyways....
So bottomline is all this talk about what works or not is a pure guess and nothing else....USCIS has always been a black box and will always be..
SoP
Yes, one should use whatever means possible, SR/Infopass/Ombudsman may result in pulling out a case hidden somewhere. Note that it is Paper World. Sequence of handling cases is in order of physical files, which, as they claim, are sequenced in receiving date (by the centers) order. They want it to keep it as a blackbox, as that helps them by not exposing their inefficiency.
You may be right. But with your logic all these talk about opening an SR, getting an infopass and blah blah is not right then. We have polls here on what worked....that's what i was telling it is too much of a coincidence. Opening an SR won't make a sick IO healthy and come back to work..taking an infopass won't bring a dropped out file back in the pile...talking to senators and congressman are useless anyways....
So bottomline is all this talk about what works or not is a pure guess and nothing else....USCIS has always been a black box and will always be..
SoP
Yes, one should use whatever means possible, SR/Infopass/Ombudsman may result in pulling out a case hidden somewhere. Note that it is Paper World. Sequence of handling cases is in order of physical files, which, as they claim, are sequenced in receiving date (by the centers) order. They want it to keep it as a blackbox, as that helps them by not exposing their inefficiency.
2010 reese witherspoon hair color.
gc_check
11-22 07:55 AM
I guess when it comes to GC processing, NOTHING is really "wrong" is it? If you get a chance to work around and beat the long lines, I guess "It's all good". Some people are lucky that they get a chance to get Labor Sub, some ppl marry the GC and some ppl like the rest of us wait in line like "honest citizens".
The REAL question is, just how many of us would have refused a good labour sub, given the present conditions, solely on the basis that "it is unfair to others"? I know i would have taken it. Reason? It's LEGAL (or used to be). Our "misfortune" (if i can use that word), is that we did not get a similar chance.
For those wondering, what I am babbling about: "Let's not look down on this guy who got his GC approved by Labour Sub, or even continuously point out that he did."
Well said, No one here is going to let go an opporturnity here, if one gets one. In my case, I did NOT go in search of one, and I did not get one. So waiting in line for years. that said, If I had got an option, I would have taken advantage of it. This guy does deserves his GC. Anyway, he/she has been here since 1997 and it is a long time too.
The REAL question is, just how many of us would have refused a good labour sub, given the present conditions, solely on the basis that "it is unfair to others"? I know i would have taken it. Reason? It's LEGAL (or used to be). Our "misfortune" (if i can use that word), is that we did not get a similar chance.
For those wondering, what I am babbling about: "Let's not look down on this guy who got his GC approved by Labour Sub, or even continuously point out that he did."
Well said, No one here is going to let go an opporturnity here, if one gets one. In my case, I did NOT go in search of one, and I did not get one. So waiting in line for years. that said, If I had got an option, I would have taken advantage of it. This guy does deserves his GC. Anyway, he/she has been here since 1997 and it is a long time too.
more...
krishna.ahd
02-18 09:24 PM
What happens if you get laid off by your employer right after you get the green card? That's different than voluntarily leaving your employer, isn't it?
I guess you are still eligible for unemployment benefits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I guess you are still eligible for unemployment benefits!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hair honey blonde hair color, reese
crystal
02-10 05:06 PM
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14438
more...
langagadu
02-15 03:52 PM
Send this link and ask him if he wants to join.
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Outsourcing&articleId=9127943&taxonomyId=72&pageNumber=1
My wife worked as a consultant for first half of 2008 with a desi employer as an employee (on W-2). After many calls and emails we received W-2 Thursday that has income and taxes of only first two months. Now he says that he showed remaining 4 months as his profit so he can only send 1099. Please advise if I can take any legal action against this employer.
Thank you
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&taxonomyName=Outsourcing&articleId=9127943&taxonomyId=72&pageNumber=1
My wife worked as a consultant for first half of 2008 with a desi employer as an employee (on W-2). After many calls and emails we received W-2 Thursday that has income and taxes of only first two months. Now he says that he showed remaining 4 months as his profit so he can only send 1099. Please advise if I can take any legal action against this employer.
Thank you
hot A straight one-color blonde
mheggade
04-16 10:05 AM
Infact today is my 2nd day at my new job. I have decided not to inform USCIS. And I am in process of hiring a new lawyer , since my previous company paid for my GC , the company lawyer asked me to go with different lawyer for all my future needs.
I will hire a lawyer and plan to file G28 form in this month.
I will hire a lawyer and plan to file G28 form in this month.
more...
house Here she had short blonde hair
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
07-12 02:57 PM
Will it come today?
Tommorow or Thursday
Tommorow or Thursday
tattoo Reese Witherspoon is a
eager_immi
01-25 07:30 AM
Don't u think that if X has contributed $1,000 and I have contributed $20/$0 I might be temped to rethink that I need to contribute more. It is not comparing $100 vs $200.
Think about it, any donation made by philanthropists are made public, i am not saying we are philanthropists here since we have a cause in mind. The reason is to prompt people to contribute. If this is not a key agenda IV then please ignore this post.
Think about it, any donation made by philanthropists are made public, i am not saying we are philanthropists here since we have a cause in mind. The reason is to prompt people to contribute. If this is not a key agenda IV then please ignore this post.
more...
pictures Since Reese has fine thin hair
ravi.shah
03-19 12:47 PM
Anyone ?
dresses Reese Witherspoon Updo
JunRN
09-21 04:39 PM
p_kumar, Sep. 18 is your Notice Date while your Receipt Date will be the date USCIS physically received your application.
more...
makeup hair reese witherspoon hair
abigel
08-07 08:41 PM
People do not agree and have different ideas - sometimes to the point of personal hurt! - this is natural. They have different interests and even when they have shared goals, sometimes their paths to those shared goals may diverge - this is natural, too. Yes, differences, discussion and divergence can lead to a final separation and then two or mroe new groups are born - and it can happen naturally and it does not have to be rushed or forced through censorship and persecution. But sometimes debates and differences actually help the whole group to stay together and find a better path or a better solution - in the heat of the discussion and in the fight of the dualling arguments a new idea, approach or solution is born. I do think that a lot of the most contentious discussions on this forum are actually the most important and interesting ones because those are the oens that will cut to the heart of the problem and reveal the real depths of the issues. Suppression of diverging opinions is the hallmark of dictatorships.
girlfriend Reese Witherspoon Hairstyle
gxtrader
09-25 11:30 PM
Car Production ordered. Travel document approved. When will I recieve FP notice? Any idea?
USCIS really feeling guilty with all these delays.....starting to give out cars! :D
USCIS really feeling guilty with all these delays.....starting to give out cars! :D
hairstyles Reese Witherspoon high
BharatPremi
03-27 03:50 PM
I somhow feel that Name Check problem has not been taken care of within its entirety. I agree with one thing that NC will be "improved" but has not been and will never be streamlined the way actually it should be.
Reference:
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/fil...Procedures.pdf
I may be wrong but my doubts are as under:
------------------------------------------
(1)180 days period is from the "Date of FBI Name Check initiation. It is not
from 485 receipt date. Nobody knows when USCIS will initiate FBI Name
Check. So I see a big playground for USCIS to play if it decides to play.
What if uSCIS sends FBI name check initiation after 2 years of 485 receipt?
Do we have a way to know or keep an eye on USCIS about this? At least I
do not know and if somebody has the information please share it.
(2) "If 485 Otherwise is processable" then USCIS can go ahead without
waiting for NC check... What if USCIS decides to keep 100000 cases on
rack eating dust just by not moving the processing date for particular
service center? This you can see right now.. USCIS is making Texas slow
day by day not moving processing date. I remember Texas was ahead
with comparison to Nebraska around May to August 2007. If this happens your case is no more "processable".. Yes you can say that you are not stuck in NC queue but you will be stuck. USCIS may come up with altogether different startegy... To align processing times with FBI processing and FBI NC initiation. That may screw the things further.
Expert or differed opinions please?
Reference:
http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/fil...Procedures.pdf
I may be wrong but my doubts are as under:
------------------------------------------
(1)180 days period is from the "Date of FBI Name Check initiation. It is not
from 485 receipt date. Nobody knows when USCIS will initiate FBI Name
Check. So I see a big playground for USCIS to play if it decides to play.
What if uSCIS sends FBI name check initiation after 2 years of 485 receipt?
Do we have a way to know or keep an eye on USCIS about this? At least I
do not know and if somebody has the information please share it.
(2) "If 485 Otherwise is processable" then USCIS can go ahead without
waiting for NC check... What if USCIS decides to keep 100000 cases on
rack eating dust just by not moving the processing date for particular
service center? This you can see right now.. USCIS is making Texas slow
day by day not moving processing date. I remember Texas was ahead
with comparison to Nebraska around May to August 2007. If this happens your case is no more "processable".. Yes you can say that you are not stuck in NC queue but you will be stuck. USCIS may come up with altogether different startegy... To align processing times with FBI processing and FBI NC initiation. That may screw the things further.
Expert or differed opinions please?
gc_maine2
05-12 03:24 PM
Thanks a lot gccovet for you reply.
You should write " AOS (Adjustment of Status) Pending". Also, don't forget to add (in #9) SS#.
GCCovet
You should write " AOS (Adjustment of Status) Pending". Also, don't forget to add (in #9) SS#.
GCCovet
wrldnw4me
05-24 12:21 PM
Fax sent
Thanks for everyone for being part of Immigration voice
Thanks for everyone for being part of Immigration voice
